2LVC

Solution NMR Structure of Ig like domain (805-892) of Obscurin-like protein 1 from Homo sapiens, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target HR8578K


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
22D 1H-13C (CT-27 ms) HSQC1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
33D HNCO1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
43D CBCA(CO)NH1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
53D HNCACB1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
63D HN(CA)CO1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
73D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
82D 1H-13C (CT-28 ms) HSQC1.0 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.010, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
92D 1H-13C (CT-56 ms) HSQC1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
102D 1H-13C (CT-42 ms) HSQC1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
113D C(CO)NH1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
123D HCCH-TOCSY1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
133D HBHA(CO)NH1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
143D H(CCO)NH1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
153D HCCH-COSY (Aliphatic)1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
163D HCCH-COSY (Aromatic)1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
172D 1H-15N HSQC J-mod0.6 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.010, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS, 12.5 mg/mL PF1 Phage80% H2O/20% D2O6.5ambient298
182D 1H-15N HSQC J-mod0.6 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.010, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS, 4 % PEG80% H2O/20% D2O6.5ambient298
192D 1H-15N HSQC J-mod1.0 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR8578K.010, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA600
2VarianINOVA750
3VarianINOVA600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingSTRUCTURE DETERMINATION WAS PERFORMED BY CYANA AND AUTOSTRUCTURE IN PARALLEL USING NOE-BASED CONSTRAINTS AND PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. CONSENSUS PEAK ASSIGNMENTS GENERATED FROM THESE PARALLEL RUNS WERE SELECTED AND USED FOR FURTHER REFINEMENT WITH CYANA, THE RDC CONSTRAINTS WERE ADDED AT LATER STAGES. A TOTAL OF 20 CONFORMERS OUT OF 100 CONFORMERS WITH THE LOWEST TARGET FUNCTION WERE SELECTED FOR REFINEMENT WITH CNS USING CNS WATER BATH REFINEMENTCNS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementCNSBrunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2structure solutionCNSBrunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
3geometry optimizationCNSBrunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4refinementCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5geometry optimizationCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6structure solutionCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7data analysisAutoStructure2.1Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
8refinementAutoStructure2.1Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
9data analysisAutoAssign2.1Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
10chemical shift assignmentAutoAssign2.1Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
11peak pickingCARA1.8.4Keller and Wuthrich
12data analysisCARA1.8.4Keller and Wuthrich
13data analysisXEASYBartels et al.
14peak pickingXEASYBartels et al.
15chemical shift assignmentXEASYBartels et al.
16data analysisCSIWishart, D.S. and B.D. Sykes.
17collectionVnmrJVarian
18processingPROSAGuntert
19geometry optimizationTALOS+Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
20geometry optimizationPALESZweckstetter, Bax
21structure validationPSVSBhattacharya, Montelione