2KPW

NMR solution structure of Lamin-B1 protein from Homo sapiens: Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium MEGA target, HR5546A (439-549)


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O20mM NH4OAc, 5mM CACL2, 200mM NACL4.5AMBIENT298
22D 1H-13C HSQC1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
33D HNCACB1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
43D CBCA(CO)NH1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
53D HBHA(CO)NH1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
63D HNCO1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
73D HNHA1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
83D HCCH-TOCSY1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
93D 1H-15N NOESY1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
103D 1H-13C NOESY1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
112D HNOE1.129 MM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LAMIN-B1 PROTEIN90% H2O/10% D2O
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA600
2BrukerAVANCE800
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingFINAL STRUCTURE QUALITY FACTORS DETERMINED USING PSVS SOFTWARE: ORDERED RESIDUES ARE DEFINED AS:15A-32A,34A-37A,42A-47A,53A-72A,75A-79A,85A-91A,101A-106A, 110A-116A.(A) RMSD(ORDERED RESIDUES):BACKBONE ATOMS: 0.7A; ALL ATOMS: 1.0A.(B) RAMACHANDRAN STATISTICS FOR ALL ORDERED RESIDUES: MOST FAVOURED REGIONS: 83.1% ADDITIONALLY ALLOWED REGIONS:16.9% (C) PROCHECK SCORES FOR ALL ORDERED RESIDUES (RAW/Z): PHI-PSI -0.76/-2.68, ALL: -0.42/-2.48 (D) MOLPROBITY CLASH SCORE (RAW/Z): 20.38/-1.97. (E) RPF SCORES FOR GOODNESS OF FIT TO NOESY DATA: RECALL:0.962 PRECISION: 0.919 F-MEASURE: 0.94 DP-SCORE 0.794.CNS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsTHE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY. DATA FOR THE BACKBONE ASSIGNMENTS WAS ACQUIRED USING GFT NMR EXPERIMENTS. AUTOMATED RESONANCE ASSIGNMENTS WERE MADE USING AUTOASSIGN AND PATTERN-PICKER ALGORITHMS DEVELOPED FOR AUTOMATED ASSIGNMENTS OF GFT DATA. SIDE CHAIN ASSIGNMENTS WERE COMPLETED MANUALLY. AUTOMATED NOESY ASSIGNMENTS WERE MADE USING AUTOSTRUCTURE AND STRUCTURE SOLUTION WAS DETERMINED USING CYANA-2.1. 100 STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED AND 20 BEST CONFORMERS WERE THEN REFINED IN A SHELL OF WATER USING CNS. INITIAL DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRIANTS WERE OBTAINED FROM TALOS. COMPLETENESS OF THE ASSIGNMENTS INCLUDING THE N-TERMINAL 6XHIS TAG WERE BACKBONE:99% SIDECHAIN: 96%. THE ASSIGNMENTS WERE VALIDATED USING AVS SOFTWARE.
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementCNS2.0.6BRUNGER, ADAMS, CLORE, GROS, NILGES AND READ
2chemical shift assignmentAutoAssign2.1Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
3chemical shift assignmentAVSMoseley and Montelione
4processingNMRPipe2008Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
5peak pickingSparky2.3Goddard
6structure solutionAutoStructure2.2.1Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
7geometry optimizationCYANA2.1Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
8collectionTopSpin2.1Bruker Biospin
9collectionVnmrJ2.1Varian
10data analysisSparky2.3Goddard
11structure calculationCYANA2.1Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich