2GOV

Solution structure of Murine p22HBP


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
13D_15N-separated_NOESY1.0 mM p22HBP U-15N/13C, 50 mM sodium phosphate90% H2O/10% D2O28 mM8.0AMBIENT303
23D_13C-separated_NOESY1.0 mM p22HBP U-15N/13C, 50 mM sodium phosphate90% H2O/10% D2O28 mM8.0AMBIENT303
33D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC)1.0 mM p22HBP U-15N/13C, 50 mM sodium phosphate90% H2O/10% D2O28 mM8.0AMBIENT303
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerDRX600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENTSTRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1851 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 372 INTRA, 425 SEQUENTIAL, 276 MEDIUM and 778 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS) AND 276 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.XwinNMR
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsALL TRIPLE-RESONANCE AND NOESY SPECTRA WERE ACQUIRED USING A CRYOGENIC PROBE.
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionXwinNMR3.5Bruker
2processingNMRPipe2004Delagio,F. et al.
3data analysisXEASY1.3Eccles, C.; Guntert, P.; Billeter, M.; Wuthrich, K.
4data analysisSPSCAN1.1.0R.W. Glaser
5data analysisGARANT2.1C. Bartels
6structural calculationCYANA2.1Guntert, P.
7refinementXplor-NIH2.9.3SCHWIETERS, C.D., KUSZEWSKI, J.J., TJANDRA, N., CLORE, G.M.