SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D NOESY1.6MM C1 DOMAIN UNLABELED, 20MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER K90% H2O/10% D2O0.5 mM NAN36.9ambient300
22D TOCSY1.6MM C1 DOMAIN UNLABELED, 20MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER K90% H2O/10% D2O0.5 mM NAN36.9ambient300
3DQF-COSY1.6MM C1 DOMAIN UNLABELED, 20MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER K90% H2O/10% D2O0.5 mM NAN36.9ambient300
43D_15N-separated_NOESY2MM C1 DOMAIN U-15N, 20MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER90% H2O/10% D2O0.5 mM NAN36.9ambient300
53D_13C-separated_NOESY2MM C1 DOMAIN U-15N/13C, 20MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER K90% H2O/10% D2O0.5 mM NAN36.9ambient300
6HNHA2MM C1 DOMAIN U-15N/13C, 20MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER K90% H2O/10% D2O0.5 mM NAN36.9ambient300
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealing; molecular dynamics; torsion angle dynamicsTHE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 583 RESTRAINTS, 501 ARE NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS, 48 DIHEDRAL ANGLE RESTRAINTS, 34 DISTANCE RESTRAINTS FROM HYDROGEN BONDSAURELIA
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number30
Representative Model1 (closest to the average)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsThe structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1data analysisAURELIA2.8.11Neidig
2processingXwinNMR2.5Bruker
3structure solutionYASARA5.11.29Krieger
4refinementYASARA5.11.29Krieger