4EDF

Dimeric hUGDH, K94E


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.08 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.237 
  • R-Value Work: 0.187 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.187 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Cofactor binding triggers a molecular switch to allosterically activate human UDP-{alpha}-D-glucose 6-dehydrogenase.

Sennett, N.C.Kadirvelraj, R.Wood, Z.A.

(2012) Biochemistry 51: 9364-9374

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi301067w
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    4EDF

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Human UDP-α-D-glucose dehydrogenase (hUGDH) catalyzes the NAD(+)-dependent oxidation of UDP-α-D-glucose (UDG) to produce UDP-α-D-glucuronic acid. The oligomeric structure of hUGDH is dynamic and can form two distinct hexameric complexes in solution. The active form of hUGDH consists of dimers that undergo a concentration-dependent association to form a hexamer with 32 symmetry. In the presence of the allosteric feedback inhibitor UDP-α-D-xylose (UDX), hUGDH changes shape to form an inactive, horseshoe-shaped complex. Previous studies have identified the UDX-induced allosteric mechanism that changes the hexameric structure to inhibit the enzyme. Here, we investigate the role of the 32 symmetry hexamer in the catalytic cycle. We engineered a stable hUGDH dimer by introducing a charge-switch substitution (K94E) in the hexamer-building interface (hUGDH(K94E)). The k(cat) of hUGDH(K94E) is ~160-fold lower than that of the wild-type enzyme, suggesting that the hexamer is the catalytically relevant state. We also show that cofactor binding triggers the formation of the 32 symmetry hexamer, but UDG is needed for the stability of the complex. The hUGDH(K94E) crystal structure at 2.08 Å resolution identifies loop(88-110) as the cofactor-responsive allosteric switch that drives hexamer formation; loop(88-110) directly links cofactor binding to the stability of the hexamer-building interface. In the interface, loop(88-110) packs against the Thr131-loop/α6 helix, the allosteric switch that responds to the feedback inhibitor UDX. We also identify a structural element (the S-loop) that explains the indirect stabilization of the hexamer by substrate and supports a sequential, ordered binding of the substrate and cofactor. These observations support a model in which (i) UDG binds to the dimer and stabilizes the S-loop to promote cofactor binding and (ii) cofactor binding orders loop(88-110) to induce formation of the catalytically active hexamer.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase
A, B, C, D
494Homo sapiensMutation(s): 1 
Gene Names: Gene ID. 7358UGDH
EC: 1.1.1.22
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for O60701 (Homo sapiens)
Explore O60701 
Go to UniProtKB:  O60701
PHAROS:  O60701
GTEx:  ENSG00000109814 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupO60701
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.08 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.237 
  • R-Value Work: 0.187 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.187 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 88.66α = 90
b = 151.07β = 107.01
c = 88.74γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
SERGUIdata collection
MOLREPphasing
PHENIXrefinement
XDSdata reduction
XDSdata scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2012-11-21
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2013-06-19
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2014-11-12
    Changes: Structure summary
  • Version 1.3: 2017-11-15
    Changes: Refinement description
  • Version 1.4: 2023-09-13
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description